Feed aggregator
RGGI Market: Auction volumes drop 1% QoQ for second quarterly sale of 2025
Newfoundland and Labrador backs offshore carbon storage innovation with C$3 mln grant
Pennsylvania Republicans introduce bill to require carbon fee public consultation, legislative authorisation for cap-and-trade
Wisconsin lawmakers consider SAF tax credit
Fossil fuel firms fall further out of Paris alignment -report
Key lawmaker pushing for Article 6 credits in EU’s 2040 climate goal
Bogong moths and the traditional owners scaling mountains to track them – video
Deberra, as the insects are known in the Taungurung language, are a vital food source for animals across Victoria's alpine country — so their rapid decline has implications for the entire ecosystem. The bogong moth is one of the more than 2,000 Australian species listed as being under threat in what scientists are calling an extinction crisis
Continue reading...It’s up to each of us to help save life on Earth – I love this challenge | Bob Brown
Taking action against species extinction can be risky but it’s better than surrender
- Explore the series – Last chance: the extinction crisis being ignored this election
- Get Guardian Australia environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as an email
Extinction. In 1844 Ketill Ketilsson won the race to grab the last pair of great auks. They were nesting on Iceland’s Eldey Island. Millions of these penguin-like birds had been slaughtered for feather-stuffed quilts to keep Europe’s burgeoning human population warm. Ketilsson strangled the two but tripped over and broke their egg. Never mind, he won the reward being offered by museums in Copenhagen for the final specimens.
A perverse market rule on species had been established: the rarer a species gets, the more valuable it becomes. It came too late for those who killed the last dodo, moa or Steller’s sea cow – but look at the money now going into resurrecting mammoths and thylacines.
Get Guardian Australia environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as an email
Continue reading...Not enough water available for Coalition’s nuclear proposal to run safely, report finds
Analyst says nuclear is the ‘thirstiest’ energy source, as report commissioned by Liberal supporters throws doubt on plan’s feasibility
- Get our afternoon election email, free app or daily news podcast
About 90% of the nuclear generation capacity the Coalition proposes to build would not have access to enough water to run safely, according to a report commissioned by Liberals Against Nuclear.
The report authored by Prof Andrew Campbell, a visiting fellow at the Australian National University, assessed nuclear energy’s water needs and the available supply across the seven sites where the Coalition has proposed new reactors.
Continue reading...