Feed aggregator
Washington’s cap-and-invest participation picks up in Q2
Rio Tinto wants biofuels feedstock production to be eligible to earn ACCUs
Google and CSIRO team up to solve solar duck dilemma with tougher, smarter inverters
The post Google and CSIRO team up to solve solar duck dilemma with tougher, smarter inverters appeared first on RenewEconomy.
Canada outlines CCUS investment tax credit guidance
Voluntary carbon market to hit $100 bln by mid-2030s, driving environmental, economic, social benefits -ratings agency
Traders mostly shorten net length across North American carbon markets
RGGI Market: RGAs hover below peaks in the absence of programme review news
Here’s how to create jobs for First Nations Australians in the clean energy transition
US DAC company announces $475 mln investment into two Louisiana facilities
No nuclear veto: if the Coalition isn’t seeking community consent, is that really consultation?
Extreme wildfires are on the rise globally, powered by the climate crisis
Peter Dutton says nuclear power plants “burn energy.” No they don’t
The post Peter Dutton says nuclear power plants “burn energy.” No they don’t appeared first on RenewEconomy.
Clothes, cookware, floss: Colorado law to ban everyday products with PFAS
Items containing ‘forever chemicals’ linked to cancer risk, lower fertility and developmental delays
A new law coming into effect in Colorado in July is banning everyday products that intentionally contain toxic “forever chemicals”, including clothes, cookware, menstruation products, dental floss and ski wax – unless they can be made safer.
Under the legislation, which takes effect on 1 July, many products using per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances – or PFAS chemicals linked to cancer risk, lower fertility and developmental delays – will be prohibited starting in 2026.
Continue reading...BRIEFING: Carbon credits key part of coal phaseout equation
The nature march had a huge turnout – so why didn’t it make bigger news? | Zoe Williams
Disruptive demonstrations are decried by the press, but given acres of coverage. This is the new conundrum of public protest: the only way to be talked about is if you’re demonised
When Just Stop Oil covered Stonehenge with orange cornflour last week, Keir Starmer was called upon to decry the act, which he dutifully did, even though anyone with even a very slight knowledge of geology will know that the marks won’t last. But that wasn’t what the Labour leader was being asked. Rather, the question was whose side was he on, between “respectable” people and disruptive ones?
A respectable person, who cares about the environment – and this, in theory, is all respectable people, because to not care about the survival of everything you love would make you unhinged – shouldn’t throw things in protest, they should peacefully march. Happily, they did: 100,000 of them at the weekend, fighting for nature. It made some news reports; it didn’t make the bulletins. No radio host gave over their phone-in to the question of whether or not this sort of thing should be allowed. This is the new conundrum of public protest; the only way to be talked about is if you’re demonised. Grab yourself a “hate march” moniker because one person got arrested, and you’ll get all the coverage of your wildest dreams, but it will be unjust, because that one person was actually a counter-protester, and there are more arrests at your average football match.
Continue reading...EU Chips Act could see sector rival steel, chemicals for emissions, says report
VCM Report: Thin trade dampens voluntary carbon spirits in dry June, but signs of ARR, CDR markets hotting up
Europe should shut down gas grids to avoid price spiral -report
New policy drivers required to close 10 bln-tonne carbon removal gap by 2050, says report
The Coalition says the rest of the G20 is powering ahead with nuclear – it’s just not true | Adam Morton
The opposition claims Australia is an outlier in the developed world in not having nuclear, yet Germany and Italy have closed their plants
- Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates
- Get our morning and afternoon news emails, free app or daily news podcast
So much has been said by the Coalition about what nuclear energy could do for Australia, with so little evidence to back it up, that it can be hard to keep up with the claims.
The key assertion by Peter Dutton and Ted O’Brien is that nuclear would lead to a “cheaper, cleaner and consistent” electricity supply. None of this has been supported.
Continue reading...