Feed aggregator
NZ Market: NZU price falls 4% amid mass selling
‘Safe’ air-quality levels in US, UK and EU still harmful for health, study says
Even small amount of exposure to minute soot particles – known as PM2.5 – raises the risk of cardiovascular disease
The sooty air pollution spewed out by cars, trucks and factories is causing widespread harm to people’s hearts and lungs even with the smallest amounts of exposure, with government regulations still routinely allowing for dangerous risks to public health, two major new studies have found.
There is no safe amount of a microscopic form of airborne pollution known as PM2.5, consisting of tiny particles of soot measuring less than the width of a human hair, for heart and lung health, US researchers found, with even small amounts raising the risk of potentially serious problems.
Continue reading...Asian forest fund makes first investment in Thai peatland restoration project
Air pollution could be significant cause of dementia – even for those not predisposed
People in areas of high PM2.5 concentrations had higher amounts of amyloid plaques in brain
Air pollution from traffic is linked to some of the more severe forms of dementia, and could be a significant cause of the condition among those who are not already genetically predisposed to it, research suggests.
Research carried out in Atlanta, Georgia, found that people with higher exposure to traffic-related fine particulate matter air pollution were more likely to have high amounts of the amyloid plaques in their brains that are associated with Alzheimer’s.
Continue reading...Mid-term evaluation of EU’s post-Covid finance facility finds obstacles to ‘green recovery’
Hydrogen hopefuls stare into valley of death as electrolyser bubble pops
The post Hydrogen hopefuls stare into valley of death as electrolyser bubble pops appeared first on RenewEconomy.
Pioneering European satellite burns up over Pacific
US market watchdog challenged regarding extent of regulation over voluntary carbon market
Clean steam: US-based startup raises $21 mln towards industrial decarbonisation
Australian passenger vehicle emission rates are 50% higher than the rest of the world – and it’s getting worse
Hard to kill: here’s why eucalypts are survival experts
Eating to save nature? Embrace potatoes, ditch meat and track your beans
The impact of meat on the environment is well known, but what about staples such as rice and legumes?
Biodiversity-conscious eaters could consider substituting potatoes for rice, cutting down on beef and lamb and asking where their beans, lentils and chickpeas are grown to reduce their impact on nature, a new study has found.
Scientists analysed 151 popular recipes around the world for their biodiversity impact. They found meat dishes were the worst offenders: recipes including chilli con carne, salsa verde pork and a Spanish lamb dish called lechazo, all had high biodiversity damage scores compared with vegan and vegetarian ones.
The massive environmental impact of eating meat has been well established, and the study reinforced this, with meat dishes scoring more than vegetarian or vegan dishes across almost all locally and globally produced scenarios. Brazilian-raised beef topped the charts. But the study, published on Wednesday in Plos One journal, also had surprising findings about the biodiversity footprint of some grains and legumes.
Continue reading...Expert group calls on Denmark to set hefty carbon tax on farmers
Article 6.2 carbon deals gathering pace despite setback in Dubai
UK biodiversity net gain tweak “dramatically undermines” local authorities with nature ambitions
Brazilian beef driving illegal deforestation in Cerrado region, NGO finds
Compliance markets will bring guardrails, scale to voluntary carbon as the two converge -experts
Improved forest management methodologies present high risk of over-crediting, says think tank
South Africa’s treasury proposes more than tripling carbon tax rate once climate law is finalised
Removing UK climate protesters’ defence ‘could erode right to trial by jury’
Attorney general’s attempt to end climate protesters’ use of consent defence is slippery slope, says KC
A government attempt to remove one of the last remaining defences for climate protesters would be a slippery slope to the erosion of the constitutional right to trial by jury, the court of appeal was told on Wednesday.
The attorney general, Victoria Prentis KC, is arguing that one of the last available defences being used by environmental protesters should be removed. Prentis is making the appeal in the case of a defendant known as C, after a string of acquittals by juries of defendants for acts of criminal damage involving daubing paint on buildings.
Continue reading...